cointelegraph

Yield Products Keep Disappointing Investors

Yield Products Keep Disappointing Investors

Opinion by: Shaaran Lakshminarayanan, co-founder of Mulitipli

DeFi gold products are fundamentally broken. 

Despite Tether Gold having more than $800 million locked in tokenized gold with Paxos Gold sitting on almost as much, yields average under 1% while traditional finance generates 3%-5% on the same asset. The supposed innovation of blockchain technology somehow made gold less profitable.

It’s disappointing that DeFi promised to democratize sophisticated financial strategies, but when it comes to gold, we have watered-down products that underperform investment approaches that are a century old.

Token printing masquerades as innovation

Most DeFi gold protocols don’t generate real yield — they print tokens. Many gold-linked DeFi tokens have dangled double-digit “emission” yields to attract deposits. Those juicy annual percentage rates (APYs) rely on printing new tokens rather than generating new income, so when the token price drops or the emissions stop, yields often crash to nothing. 

The protocol wasn’t creating value but redistributing existing value through inflation, a classic Ponzi structure disguised as innovation.

This pattern repeats across gold DeFi, with protocols launching unsustainable emission rewards to attract total value locked (TVL), then watching yields crater when reality sets in. Token emissions create an illusion of productivity while destroying long-term value by diluting existing holders when protocols can’t generate real returns.

Forced complexity destroys returns

Gold investors want gold exposure. DeFi forces them into volatile asset pairs and liquidity pools that guarantee suboptimal outcomes. During gold rallies, liquidity providers suffer impermanent loss as their gold gets automatically sold for stablecoins, missing the upside they invested in gold to capture.

These LP structures are also capital inefficient, forcing half of an investor’s funds into low-yield stablecoins instead of gold exposure. The risk-reward calculation becomes absurd. Investors accept impermanent loss risk and reduced gold exposure for yields barely exceeding what they could earn holding stablecoins directly.

Missing the real opportunity

DeFi protocols lack the infrastructure to replicate traditional finance’s strategies at scale. Gold futures often trade at premiums to spot prices, especially in contango markets. Sophisticated traders can capture this spread by holding physical gold and shorting futures contracts, precisely what DeFi should excel at automating.

Related: Tether Gold rides bullion boom as central banks, ETFs rush to accumulate

The result: Institutional players continue earning attractive returns on gold while DeFi investors get stuck with inflationary rewards and forced complexity. Real money stays in traditional finance while DeFi fights over scraps.

The path forward

New protocols finally address these fundamental flaws through market-neutral arbitrage strategies instead of token printing. Because of this shift, they generate real yield by capturing contango spreads.

Investors can get pure gold exposure with institutional-grade returns. This approach democratizes strategies that previously required $5 million minimums and direct institutional relationships, making hedge fund opportunities accessible with just $1,000 and a wallet.

Keeping it simple

The best DeFi products eliminate unnecessary complexity, giving gold investors exposure without forced diversification. Single-sided staking preserves investment thesis while generating yield through arbitrage strategies. 

This explains why tokenized gold underperforms decades-old physical gold strategies. The industry prioritized rapid deployment over sustainable economics, TVL growth over actual returns.

Market consequences

The gold DeFi failure reflects broader issues with how we think about yield generation. Too many protocols prioritize TVL growth over sustainable economics and optimize for launch metrics instead of long-term value creation. 

Real solutions require infrastructure investment in proper derivatives trading capabilities, risk management systems and institutional-grade execution. That’s a lot harder than launching another liquidity mining program.

The market is maturing, however, as investors increasingly recognize the difference between real yield and token emissions, demanding actual value creation over higher APY numbers.

The adoption catalyst

The next wave of DeFi adoption will come from real yield, not speculation, as traditional finance faces increasing regulatory pressure and institutional investors seek alternatives that deliver comparable returns with better transparency. Gold represents the perfect testing ground with its well-understood asset class, documented arbitrage opportunities, and proven demand for yield.

The question isn’t whether gold DeFi will work. It’s which protocols will finally deliver on the original promise with existing technology, proven strategies, and a ready market.

The gold rush continues, but this time it just might strike gold.

Opinion by: Shaaran Lakshminarayanan, co-founder of Mulitipli.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.